Maguro Vs Hamachi For Mac
Posted By admin On 13.02.20Pertino is really focused on simplicity and when you install the client, you are connected. We will have a Mac client option available next month and are focused on Linux, Mobile (andriod and iOS) shortly after. XP is also part of the plans in the near future as well. Also we have some use cases that AD works as well through Pertino.
The need to LMI is really not necessary as you would use RDP to the remote host instead since you are networked through Pertino. I would recommend trying it out as it is simple and free for the first few devices.
IT Kid: Hamachi is a good product that has been around a long time. Pertino has developed a new approach to building VPN-like WAN connections that leverages the cloud to make it super easy and to be able to add a wealth of new cloud-based services in the future (think: security, management and optimization). But you want to know how Pertino and Hamachi compares today. Here is a summary:. Pertino required ZERO configuration - no 5-net addressing, no topology configuration (e.g. When you create a network using Pertino, the devices on your Pertino network are aware of each other as they share the same network information automatically. Each time you add a device (or removed), the information is then pushed out to your Pertino network.
The cloud will provide the address and routing info (leverages IPv6) so it knows what destination addresses will be sent to the cloud. If the devices are local to each other, we do make a distinction in the device name so you don't get confused but normally you wouldn't want to sent traffic to the cloud if the machines are local (but you can). David (Pertino) wrote: When you create a network using Pertino, the devices on your Pertino network are aware of each other as they share the same network information automatically. Each time you add a device (or removed), the information is then pushed out to your Pertino network. The cloud will provide the address and routing info (leverages IPv6) so it knows what destination addresses will be sent to the cloud. If the devices are local to each other, we do make a distinction in the device name so you don't get confused but normally you wouldn't want to sent traffic to the cloud if the machines are local (but you can).
Local no, connectivity via in house VPN (site-to-site) yes. I was thinking of a backup VPN service - in case the tunnel is down I can get into one of the systems via your service. I want to know how to direct traffic between the two routes. How can this be done. If it was a web site (using Hamachi as an example) I could either goto for site-to-site vpn routing or for Hamachi routing.
What would I do for Pertino routing in the example above? Reason is for local monitoring - what tunnel is up?
David (Pertino) wrote: I understand now. In the case of Pertino, you would use the DNS name for the host (example ') which will resolve to the correct IPv4 address to the remote site or use the windows machine name (example 'mywebserver') which will resolve the IPv6 address that we assign to the machine to go through Pertino. You can also use the IPv4 address (normal connection) or the IPv6 address (Pertino connection) as well. Thanks - that is what I was asking for. Now just need to get a linux version. If I try and filter all the marketing fluff out of the list of differences, I'm still not clear what we're left with as differences between Hamachi and Pertino?
I'm looking at options to run a standalone file server with an eye on perhaps even a small domain as a Windows Azure VM. I know I've had Hamachi up and running in 5 minutes and it'll cost $30/year for a dozen machines. Pertino would cost me $120/ month and whilst it might buy me something, in hard fast technical terms I'm not clear from the website what it actually is buying me? Hutchingsp wrote: If I try and filter all the marketing fluff out of the list of differences, I'm still not clear what we're left with as differences between Hamachi and Pertino? I'm looking at options to run a standalone file server with an eye on perhaps even a small domain as a Windows Azure VM. I know I've had Hamachi up and running in 5 minutes and it'll cost $30/year for a dozen machines.
Pertino would cost me $120/ month and whilst it might buy me something, in hard fast technical terms I'm not clear from the website what it actually is buying me? Sorry to dig up a dead thread, but this is exactly the question i'm asking and the sudden lack of a response from Pertino makes me nervous. Jonathan4215 wrote: hutchingsp wrote: If I try and filter all the marketing fluff out of the list of differences, I'm still not clear what we're left with as differences between Hamachi and Pertino? I'm looking at options to run a standalone file server with an eye on perhaps even a small domain as a Windows Azure VM. I know I've had Hamachi up and running in 5 minutes and it'll cost $30/year for a dozen machines.
Pertino would cost me $120/ month and whilst it might buy me something, in hard fast technical terms I'm not clear from the website what it actually is buying me? Sorry to dig up a dead thread, but this is exactly the question i'm asking and the sudden lack of a response from Pertino makes me nervous Hi Jonathan - I noticed the question in the other thread, but saw that other Spiceheads were replying to the question.
My take on replying to Spiceworks inquiries is to let the community chime in first, and reply only when clarification is needed or if the question is one that only we can answer. We've earned a great reputation here in the community, but we understand that we still wear that 'vendor' badge and therefore have to constantly build trust through authenticity. If you'd like a fresh answer on Hamachi, here it is: Hamachi is a cool product.
The concept was well ahead of its time and as SAM mentioned, they are our direct competitor in what they enable - a virtual LAN. The biggest differences are in how they achieve it. Unfortunately, we don't have a ton of visibility of the actual hardware their networks run on.
It's easy to point out the biggest differences which are the investment in the product (per LogMeIn blogs and earnings calls), and enterprise-grade infrastructure that we've put in place.not to mention live support. We treat our networks as infrastructure that our customers businesses run on. We're not just another app.we're business critical.
Yes we're a relatively young product, but we're 100% invested in first delivering rock solid connectivity, and expanding to offer additional network services that can be deployed across your Pertino network. Hamachi offers a free 5 device network. No management console.
Just go in, create your network. Call your buddy and tell them to download. Then tell them the ID to enter. Once you get into the paid version, they do have some interesting network topologies that provide a modicum of customization. Pertino relies on multi-vendor and location infrastructure to ensure redundancy and reliability. Networks are automatically configured in a mesh-like topology. You can throw up and shut down networks with just a few clicks, and manage them all from one pane of glass.
Maguro Vs Hamachi For Mac
I believe many Spiceheads have chosen Pertino for the product as it is today as much as for the vision and support. Pertino's roadmap has been guided by the feedback of the community and the individual contributions of dozens of Spiceheads. Edit: added link to referenced thread. Mick3735 wrote: Just installed pertino as a test on a phone, server and laptop, and was astonished that after I installed it on the laptop, I opened up network and there was the server. Exactly what I've been looking for. Let me know when your reseller program goes live and I'll sign up every one of my clients.
What took you so long?;-p We do have an affiliate program offering incentives for any resellers that either recommend or subscribe their clients. Please PM me for more information. Is also in the process of designing a comprehensive partner program to provide additional benefits and sales enablement for MSPs, VARs, and IT consultants.